Location Recovery on Notre Dame
0.2Median Error (m)Huber
Evaluation Results
| Method | Links | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HuberProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.2 | 5,000 | |
| ShapeKickProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.2 | 1.5 | |
| ShapeFitProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=without2016.08 | 0.3 | 4 | |
| ShapeKickProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=without2016.08 | 0.4 | 3.6 | |
| ShapeKickProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=without2016.08 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
| ShapeFitProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=without2016.08 | 0.5 | 1.4 | |
| LUDProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=without2016.08 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
| HuberProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.5 | 5,000 | |
| ShapeKickProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
| LUDProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.5 | 1.4 | |
| NLSProblem formulation=Robust PCA, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.8 | 2,000 | |
| NLSProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 0.9 | 669 | |
| LUDProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=without2016.08 | 1.6 | 4 | |
| LUDProblem formulation=Monopartite k = 6, 1dSfM Outlier Removal=with2016.08 | 2.3 | 3.5 |