Traffic Signal Control Fairness on Colorado Springs 18-intersection network (test)
69.7Maximum Starvation Time (s)OurRL+R
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OurRL+RRV Penetration Rate=90%2025.12 | 69.7 | 48 | |
| OurRL+RRV Penetration Rate=70%2025.12 | 108.6 | 55.3 | |
| OurRLRV Penetration Rate=90%2025.12 | 139.5 | 60.6 | |
| OurRL+RRV Penetration Rate=80%2025.12 | 151.9 | 64.2 | |
| OurRL+RRV Penetration Rate=60%2025.12 | 177.3 | 70.1 | |
| OurRLRV Penetration Rate=80%2025.12 | 191.8 | 84.2 | |
| OurRLRV Penetration Rate=70%2025.12 | 196.2 | 70.7 | |
| OurRL+RRV Penetration Rate=50%2025.12 | 210.6 | 95.9 | |
| OurRLRV Penetration Rate=60%2025.12 | 228.7 | 94.7 | |
| OurRLRV Penetration Rate=40%2025.12 | 242.5 | 106.7 | |
| OurRLRV Penetration Rate=50%2025.12 | 254.9 | 103.1 | |
| Wang et al.RV Penetration Rate=60%2025.12 | 269.9 | 142.9 | |
| Wang et al.RV Penetration Rate=70%2025.12 | 272.1 | 87.5 | |
| OurRL+RRV Penetration Rate=40%2025.12 | 281 | 126.1 | |
| Wang et al.RV Penetration Rate=80%2025.12 | 330.1 | 101.6 | |
| Wang et al.RV Penetration Rate=50%2025.12 | 344.2 | 127.6 | |
| Wang et al.RV Penetration Rate=90%2025.12 | 374.8 | 128.2 | |
| Wang et al.RV Penetration Rate=40%2025.12 | 437.1 | 151.1 | |
| HV-SigRV Penetration Rate=0%2025.12 | 500 | 135 |