Part-of-Speech Tagging on CoNLL 2009 (test)
99.03Ca AccuracyOur Global (B=8)
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our Global (B=8)Normalization Strategy=Global, Beam Size (B)=82016.03 | 99.03 | 94.72 | 99.02 | 97.65 | 97.52 | 98.37 | 98.97 | 97.47 | |
| Our Local (B=1)Normalization Strategy=Local, Beam Size (B)=12016.03 | 98.91 | 94.56 | 98.96 | 97.36 | 97.35 | 98.02 | 98.88 | 97.29 | |
| Our Local (B=8)Normalization Strategy=Local, Beam Size (B)=82016.03 | 98.88 | 94.56 | 98.96 | 97.4 | 97.35 | 98.02 | 98.89 | 97.3 | |
| Linear CRF2016.03 | 98.81 | 94.45 | 98.9 | 97.5 | 97.14 | 97.9 | 98.79 | 97.17 | |
| Ling et al. (2015)2016.03 | 98.77 | 94.38 | 99 | 97.6 | 97.84 | 97.06 | 98.71 | 97.16 |