CEC
Benchmarks
TaskDatasetSOTA resultTrendResults
CEC MTMOO ins6 2019
-1.034MSS
10
CEC MTMOO ins5 2019
-0.67MSS
10
CEC MTMOO ins4 2019
1.171MSS
10
CEC MTMOO ins3 2019
1.568MSS
10
CEC MTMOO ins2 2019
-1.082MSS
10
CEC MTMOO ins1 2019
1.031MSS
10
CEC 10-dimensional 2020
7Wins Count
10
CEC Composition Functions 2017
1.94CF1 Mean
10
CEC 100D 2014
107,800F1 Value
9
CEC 50D 2014
36,630Objective Value (F1)
9
CEC 100D 2017
3,540F1 Mean Objective Value
8
CEC 50D 2017
831F1 Value
8
CEC 10D 2017
562F1 Mean
8
CEC D=30 2014
7,028F01 Function Value
8
CEC 2017 (out-of-sample)
1.664Average Rank
8
CEC 2022 (calibration)
2.125Average Rank
8
CEC 2022
-6.93Objective Value F01 (D10)
8
CEC 30-dimensional functions 2017
3.272Error F01
8
CEC 58 benchmark cases 2017
3.784Mean Log10 Error
8
CEC 24 benchmark cases 2022
0.893Mean Log10 Error
8
CEC Multimodal F10 50D 2017
4,782.937Mean Value
8
CEC F9 (50D) Multimodal 2017
1,257.971Mean
8
CEC F8 (50D) Multimodal 2017
907.918Mean Objective Value
8
CEC Multimodal F7 (50D) 2017
881.064Mean Value
8
CEC Multimodal F6 (50D) 2017
671.056Mean Objective Value
8