UGV Mission Planning on UGV Mission Planning Simulation
0Energy Constraint ViolationRSPECT
Evaluation Results
| Method | Links | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.09 | 5,800 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.09 | 5,150 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.09 | 7,300 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.24 | 6,260 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.24 | 6,250 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.24 | 9,210 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.51 | 6,630 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.5 | 7,270 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.5 | 10,890 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.92 | 6,970 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.92 | 8,200 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.91 | 12,160 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.08 | 2,870 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.08 | 3,810 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.08 | 5,420 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.23 | 3,550 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.23 | 5,250 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.23 | 7,620 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.49 | 4,030 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.49 | 6,360 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.48 | 9,310 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.87 | 4,420 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.87 | 7,300 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.86 | 10,720 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.07 | 2,280 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.07 | 3,570 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.07 | 5,130 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.22 | 2,990 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.23 | 5,020 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.22 | 7,290 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.48 | 3,540 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.48 | 6,150 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.48 | 9,020 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.86 | 4,050 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.87 | 7,240 | |
| RSPECTUGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.86 | 10,680 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.5 | 4,440 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 2.48 | 5,470 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 2.93 | 7,130 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 6.89 | 7,490 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 9.9 | 9,940 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 15.4 | 9,450 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 18.2 | 12,770 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 0.48 | 2,230 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 0.48 | 2,910 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 0.54 | 3,490 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 2.23 | 3,000 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 2.53 | 4,780 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 2.72 | 6,280 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 5.8 | 3,670 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 7.6 | 6,830 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 7.8 | 9,150 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 0 | 13.9 | 4,270 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 0 | 14.8 | 8,800 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=10.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 0 | 23.4 | 11,990 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 4 | 14.5 | 5,000 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 8 | 0.51 | 3,790 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 16 | 17.6 | 16,130 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 28 | 6.84 | 4,250 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 40 | 7.56 | 13,040 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 44 | 2.69 | 3,630 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 64 | 2.76 | 9,470 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 72 | 14.4 | 11,770 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=5.0, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 80 | 0.52 | 2,710 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 88 | 7.45 | 9,160 | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 100 | — | — | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 100 | — | — | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=25, Recharge ratio (gamma)=22025.11 | 100 | — | — | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 100 | — | — | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=50, Recharge ratio (gamma)=12025.11 | 100 | — | — | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=75, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 100 | — | — | |
| Yu et al.UGV Speed=2.5, Problem size (n)=100, Recharge ratio (gamma)=02025.11 | 100 | — | — |