List your company

Relation Extraction on CoNLL04 (test)

75.8F1 ScoreTable-Sequence Encoders
60.40864.40468.472.396May 14, 2019Jan 12, 2020Sep 12, 2020May 14, 2021Jan 13, 2022Sep 14, 2022May 16, 2023

Evaluation results

MethodLinks
Table-Sequence EncodersAveraging=macro-averaged2020.1075.8——75.4—
E2H-largeModel Category=Unified Models, Model Scale=large, Large-scale continued pre-training=false2023.0575.31————
LasUIE*Model Category=Unified Models, Large-scale continued pre-training=true2023.0575.3————
UIE*Model Category=Unified Models, Large-scale continued pre-training=true2023.0575————
Table-Sequence EncodersAveraging=micro-averaged2020.1073.8——73.6—
TablERT2020.1072.67570.3——
TriMFEvaluation protocol=strict2021.0172.3573.0171.63——
E2H-baseModel Category=Unified Models, Model Scale=base, Large-scale continued pre-training=false2023.0572.23————
MRC4ERE++Evaluation protocol=strict2021.0171.972.271.5——
T5-largeModel Category=Unified Models, Model Scale=large, Large-scale continued pre-training=false2023.0571.72————
SpERT (Eberts and Ulges, 2020)2020.1071.57370——
SpERTEvaluation protocol=strict2021.0171.4773.0470——
TANLModel Category=Unified Models, Large-scale continued pre-training=false2023.0571.4————
T5-baseModel Category=Unified Models, Model Scale=base, Large-scale continued pre-training=false2023.0569.58————
Multi-turn QAquestion type=Natural2019.0568.969.268.2——
Multi-turn QAEvaluation protocol=strict2021.0168.969.268.2——
Multi-turn QA (Li et al., 2019)2020.1068.969.268.2——
Zhang et al. (2017)2019.0567.8————
Zhang et al. (2017)2020.1067.8————
Relation-MetricAvg. Epoch Train Time=101 sec, Avg. Test Time=4.5 sec2019.0562.6867.9758.18——
Multihead2019.0562.0463.7560.43——
Multi-head + ATEvaluation protocol=strict2021.0162.04————
Bekoulis et al. (2018)2019.0562————
Multihead with AT2019.0561.95————
Replicating Multihead with ATAvg. Epoch Train Time=614 sec, Avg. Test Time=34 sec2019.0561.3865.8157.59——
Table Representation2019.05617650.9——
Miwa and Sasaki (2014)2019.0561————
Miwa and Sasaki (2014)2020.10617650.9——
Bekoulis et al.Averaging=macro-averaged2020.10———62—
Bekoulis et al.Averaging=macro-averaged2020.10———62—
Best SLMPrompting=schema-enumerated, Selection=strongest tuned SLM per benchmark2026.06————99.5
ClaudeInference mode=zero-shot2026.06————91.9
Claude Sonnet 4.6Shots=0-shot2026.06————91.9
Eberts and UlgesAveraging=micro-averaged2020.10———71.5—
Eberts and UlgesAveraging=macro-averaged2020.10———72.9—
GPT-5.4Shots=0-shot2026.06————92.6
GPT-5.4Inference mode=zero-shot2026.06————92.6
Li et al.2020.10———68.9—
Llama-3.2-3B GenTuneModel=Llama-3.2-3B, Shots=2s2026.06————99.5
Llama-3.2-3B GenTuneModel=Llama-3.2-3B, Shots=0s2026.06————98.8
Miwa and SasakiAveraging=micro-averaged2020.10———61—
Nguyen and VerspoorAveraging=macro-averaged2020.10———64.4—
Qwen2.5-0.5B GenTuneModel=Qwen2.5-0.5B, Shots=2s2026.06————99.3
RoB-baseBackbone=RoBERTa, Parameters=125M, Inference mode=fine-tuned per benchmark2026.06————100
RoB-largeBackbone=RoBERTa, Parameters=355M, Inference mode=fine-tuned per benchmark2026.06————100
Tran and KavuluruAveraging=macro-averaged2020.10———62.3—
Zhang et al.Averaging=micro-averaged2020.10———67.8—