Quadratic Optimization on Star Shaped constraint family (test)
100Feasibility (%)Projected Gradient
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Projected GradientMethod Type=Classical2026.04 | 100 | 38.41 | 0.34 | |
| Homeomorphic ProjectionMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 100 | 128.653 | 3.7 | |
| FAB: 2 DecoderMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 100 | 0.6 | 0.37 | |
| FAB: Phase 1 OnlyMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 100 | 0.61 | 0.34 | |
| FAB: No Hinge LossMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 100 | 0.6 | 0.38 | |
| FAB: No DξMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 100 | 0.86 | 0.35 | |
| FSNetMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 99.9 | 3.13 | 1.03 | |
| FABMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 99.9 | 0.56 | 0.34 | |
| FAB: 3 DecoderMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 99.9 | 0.65 | 0.34 | |
| Penalty NNMethod Type=ML-Based2026.04 | 98.2 | 0.2 | 0.27 | |
| Interior PointMethod Type=Classical2026.04 | 96.6 | 70.65 | 1.77 | |
| Penalty MethodMethod Type=Classical2026.04 | 75.8 | 61.37 | 0.87 | |
| Augmented LagrangianMethod Type=Classical2026.04 | 75 | 70.7 | 0.89 |