Node Classification on Citeseer (Accuracy (%), Defense Gain)
83.22Accuracy (%)LAGA
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LAGAScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 83.22 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 83.12 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 83.05 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 82.75 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 82.72 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 82.48 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 81.87 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 81.62 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 81.51 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 81.46 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 81.34 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 80.72 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 79.73 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 79.36 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 79.19 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 79.08 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 78.45 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 78.11 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 78.03 | — | |
| GraphPatcherScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 77.53 | — | |
| UltraTAG-SScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 77.52 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 77.19 | — | |
| GraphPatcherScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 77.16 | — | |
| UltraTAG-SScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 77.13 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 76.99 | — | |
| GraphPatcherScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 76.92 | — | |
| RawlsGCNScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 76.34 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 76.33 | — | |
| UltraTAG-SScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 76.27 | — | |
| NRGNNScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 75.82 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 75.27 | — | |
| GraFNScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 75.04 | — | |
| TOPOAUCScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 75.03 | — | |
| CTD-MLMScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 74.88 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 74.72 | — | |
| GraphHopScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 74.6 | — | |
| PI-GNNScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 74.54 | — | |
| LLM-TGScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 74.25 | — | |
| PoDAScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 74.16 | — | |
| LLM4RGNNScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 74.12 | — | |
| RawlsGCNScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 74.01 | — | |
| DHGRScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 73.69 | — | |
| UltraTAG-SScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 73.66 | — | |
| GraFNScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 73.48 | — | |
| LLM-TGScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 73.43 | — | |
| UltraTAG-SScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 73.34 | — | |
| CTD-MLMScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 73.19 | — | |
| LLM-TGScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 73.19 | — | |
| SUBLIMEScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 73.12 | — | |
| SEGSLScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 73.08 | — | |
| GraphHopScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 72.78 | — | |
| RawlsGCNScenario=Structure Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 72.72 | — | |
| TOPOAUCScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 72.59 | — | |
| LTE4GScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.22025.10 | 72.57 | — | |
| LLM4RGNNScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 72.39 | — | |
| PoDAScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 72.35 | — | |
| SEGSLScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 71.83 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 71.7 | — | |
| GPR-GNNDefense status=Original, Graph condition=Clean2024.12 | 71.03 | — | |
| CTD-MLMScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 71.03 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 70.94 | — | |
| LLM4RGNNScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 70.87 | — | |
| GCNDefense status=Original, Graph condition=Clean2024.12 | 70.79 | — | |
| SUBLIMEScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 70.69 | — | |
| GCNDefense status=Ours, Graph condition=Clean2024.12 | 70.62 | — | |
| LAGAScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 70.33 | — | |
| LLM-TGScenario=Text Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 70.22 | — | |
| GraphHopScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 70.11 | — | |
| GraFNScenario=Label Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 69.74 | — | |
| LLM-TGScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 69.7 | — | |
| GPR-GNNDefense status=Ours, Graph condition=Clean2024.12 | 69.31 | — | |
| NRGNNScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 69.11 | — | |
| GPR-GNNDefense status=Ours, Graph condition=Metattack2024.12 | 69.02 | 12.09 | |
| SEGSLScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 68.54 | — | |
| DHGRScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 68.52 | — | |
| PI-GNNScenario=Label Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 68.37 | — | |
| GPR-GNNGraph Condition=Clean, Defense Status=Ours2024.12 | 68.36 | — | |
| PoDAScenario=Text Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 68.27 | — | |
| TOPOAUCScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 68.17 | — | |
| GPR-GNNGraph Condition=Clean, Defense Status=Original2024.12 | 67.95 | — | |
| LTE4GScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.42025.10 | 67.2 | — | |
| GPR-GNNGraph Condition=Nettack, Defense Status=Ours2024.12 | 66.94 | 8.41 | |
| GCNDefense status=Ours, Graph condition=Metattack2024.12 | 66.17 | 5.15 | |
| SUBLIMEScenario=Structure Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 66.13 | — | |
| GCNGraph Condition=Clean, Defense Status=Ours2024.12 | 65.17 | — | |
| UltraTAG-SScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 64.72 | — | |
| GCNGraph Condition=Clean, Defense Status=Original2024.12 | 64.04 | — | |
| GCNGraph Condition=Nettack, Defense Status=Ours2024.12 | 63.57 | 9.96 | |
| DHGRScenario=Structure Noise, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 63.4 | — | |
| GATDefense status=Original, Graph condition=Clean2024.12 | 62.09 | — | |
| LLM-TGScenario=Text Sparsity, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 61.5 | — | |
| GCNDefense status=Original, Graph condition=Metattack2024.12 | 61.02 | — | |
| GATDefense status=Ours, Graph condition=Clean2024.12 | 60.96 | — | |
| LTE4GScenario=Label Imbalance, Perturbation Ratio=0.82025.10 | 60.88 | — | |
| GPR-GNNGraph Condition=Nettack, Defense Status=Original2024.12 | 58.53 | — | |
| GATGraph Condition=Clean, Defense Status=Ours2024.12 | 57.41 | — | |
| GATDefense status=Ours, Graph condition=Metattack2024.12 | 57.35 | 7.76 | |
| GPR-GNNDefense status=Original, Graph condition=Metattack2024.12 | 56.93 | — | |
| GATGraph Condition=Clean, Defense Status=Original2024.12 | 56.64 | — | |
| GCNGraph Condition=Nettack, Defense Status=Original2024.12 | 53.61 | — |