Multi-agent consensus coordination on Multi-Agent LLM Consensus System (50 samples) benchmark leaderboard · SOTA2 Research

Multi-agent consensus coordination on Multi-Agent LLM Consensus System (50 samples)

100Consensus Rate (CR)No Attacker

Evaluation Results

Method	Links
No Attacker2026.05		100	3.78
No Attacker2026.05		100	3.88
No Attacker2026.05		100	3.94
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		98	3.92
No Attacker2026.05		96	3.84
No Attacker2026.05		96	4.22
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		96	3.92
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		96	3.92
No Attacker2026.05		96	4.2
No Attacker2026.05		96	4.36
No Attacker2026.05		96	4.36
No Attacker2026.05		95	4.32
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		94	4.2
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		92	4.22
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		92	4.16
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		92	3.98
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		92	4.58
No Attacker2026.05		90	5.14
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		90	5.08
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		90	5
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		88	4.68
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		86	4.56
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		86	4.54
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		86	4.56
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		84	4.3
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		84	4.78
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		84	4.78
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		84	5.08
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		84	4.85
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		83	4.91
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		82	4.94
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		82	4.68
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		82	4.7
No Attacker2026.05		82	5.52
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		82	5.18
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		82	5.18
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		80	5.04
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		80	4.64
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		78	5.26
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		74	5.52
LLM-Based Attacker2026.05		72	4.88
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		72	5.62
RL-Based Attacker2026.05		70	5.98
Guessed RL Attacker2026.05		70	5.88