Modality Transfer on Fibroblast cells (test)
0.0005MSEGAN-based modality transfer model
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=g vs. i, Type=GT HQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0005 | 21.56 | 90.8 | 32.9 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=d vs. f, Type=GT HQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.001 | 23.96 | 92.71 | 29.91 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=a vs. c, Type=GT HQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0011 | 23.15 | 92.83 | 29.65 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=b vs. c, Type=LQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0033 | 28.52 | 86.38 | 24.86 | |
| Wide-field imagingFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=a vs. b, Type=GT HQ vs. LQ2024.03 | 0.0037 | 35.89 | 85.17 | 24.34 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=e vs. f, Type=LQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.004 | 47.01 | 82.81 | 23.97 | |
| Wide-field imagingFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=d vs. e, Type=GT HQ vs. LQ2024.03 | 0.0044 | 50.02 | 67.23 | 23.54 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=g vs. i, Type=GT HQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0051 | 17.08 | 94.52 | 32.92 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=d vs. f, Type=GT HQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.006 | 18.4 | 84.1 | 32.23 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=h vs. i, Type=LQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0064 | 45.82 | 83.75 | 21.91 | |
| Wide-field imagingFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=g vs. h, Type=GT HQ vs. LQ2024.03 | 0.0066 | 61.66 | 84.64 | 21.77 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=a vs. c, Type=GT HQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0067 | 14.37 | 92.3 | 31.71 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=h vs. i, Type=LQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0068 | 55.48 | 85.81 | 21.65 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=e vs. f, Type=LQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.007 | 50.04 | 85.12 | 21.55 | |
| Wide-field imagingFigure Reference=Fig. 4, Comparison Pair=g vs. h, Type=GT HQ vs. LQ2024.03 | 0.0071 | 80.52 | 75.7 | 21.46 | |
| Wide-field imagingFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=d vs. e, Type=GT HQ vs. LQ2024.03 | 0.0077 | 65.68 | 83.2 | 21.15 | |
| GAN-based modality transfer modelFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=b vs. c, Type=LQ vs. Generated HQ2024.03 | 0.0092 | 50.84 | 82.92 | 20.35 | |
| Wide-field imagingFigure Reference=Fig. 3, Comparison Pair=a vs. b, Type=GT HQ vs. LQ2024.03 | 0.0106 | 72.49 | 81.42 | 19.73 |