Incomplete Multi-View Clustering on CUB benchmark leaderboard · SOTA2 Research

Incomplete Multi-View Clustering on CUB

86AccuracyStraight-Path Flow Matching

Evaluation Results

Method	Links
Straight-Path Flow Matching2026.07		86	78.19	72.28
Straight-Path Flow Matching2026.07		82.67	72.8	66.31
DCG2026.07		82.23	77.7	69.21
Straight-Path Flow Matching2026.07		80.5	71.74	63.15
DCG2026.07		77.17	71.35	59.85
CPSPAN2026.07		76.67	71.38	58.65
DCG2026.07		75.5	72.21	59.12
CPSPAN2026.07		74.33	70.33	56.84
CPSPAN2026.07		73.33	69.68	57.17
ProImp2026.07		71.83	64.45	51.64
DVIMVC2026.07		70.42	68.43	56.35
APADC2026.07		70.33	70.33	56.84
ProImp2026.07		69.56	64.19	52.06
ProImp2026.07		69.33	69.65	55.93
DVIMVC2026.07		68.98	68.81	52.61
GCFAGG2026.07		67.67	64.14	51.14
DVIMVC2026.07		63.83	63	50.5
DSIMVC2026.07		63.67	59.85	46.23
GCFAGG2026.07		62.72	60.27	45.03
GCFAGG2026.07		59.63	55.95	39.91
APADC2026.07		53.04	59.05	42.98
DSIMVC2026.07		49.22	49.93	32.8
DSIMVC2026.07		48.99	49.61	32.35
APADC2026.07		48.53	59.93	41.54
ICMVC2026.07		45.13	41.32	25.11
DCP2026.07		42.77	55.42	33.39
ICMVC2026.07		41.7	37.78	21.62
DCP2026.07		40.6	52.37	31.41
DCP2026.07		38.87	50.15	31.18
ICMVC2026.07		32.33	33.36	16.85