Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection on San Diego (Case 1)
99.27AUC (PD vs PF)GTVLRR
Evaluation Results
| Method | Links | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTVLRR2024.01 | 99.27 | 42.35 | 6.04 | |
| RGAE2024.01 | 99.21 | 18.23 | 0.76 | |
| GAED2024.01 | 99.02 | 18.82 | 0.8 | |
| ADLR2024.01 | 98.92 | 79.43 | 31.82 | |
| MTVLRR2024.01 | 98.84 | 41.59 | 2.47 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=HTV2024.01 | 98.66 | 38.61 | 3.34 | |
| PCA-TLRSR2024.01 | 98.27 | 31.89 | 4.45 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=Nuclear2024.01 | 97.38 | 16.33 | 1.01 | |
| LSDM-MoG2024.01 | 97.09 | 55.05 | 20.11 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=HSSTV2024.01 | 96.78 | 23.52 | 1.45 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=SSTV2024.01 | 96.03 | 28.51 | 4.86 | |
| GRX2024.01 | 94.03 | 17.78 | 5.89 | |
| AHMID2024.01 | 92.63 | 24.25 | 3.83 | |
| 2S-GLRT2024.01 | 90.74 | 0.02 | 0.07 |