Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection on Los Angeles I (Case 1)
99.66AUC (PD vs PF)AHMID
Evaluation Results
| Method | Links | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHMID2024.01 | 99.66 | 6.38 | 0.46 | |
| ADLR2024.01 | 99.65 | 75.02 | 6.72 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=HTV2024.01 | 99.65 | 18.85 | 3.63 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=SSTV2024.01 | 99.65 | 19.13 | 4.05 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=HSSTV2024.01 | 99.65 | 19.12 | 4.04 | |
| Joint Background-Anomaly-Noise DecompositionRegularization=Nuclear2024.01 | 99.62 | 17.26 | 3.06 | |
| LSDM-MoG2024.01 | 99.5 | 14.1 | 0.39 | |
| RGAE2024.01 | 99.48 | 3.92 | 0.06 | |
| GAED2024.01 | 99.38 | 3.79 | 0.06 | |
| GTVLRR2024.01 | 99.23 | 12.35 | 1.43 | |
| GRX2024.01 | 98.87 | 8.91 | 1.14 | |
| PCA-TLRSR2024.01 | 98.74 | 11.09 | 1.05 | |
| MTVLRR2024.01 | 98.48 | 15.7 | 1.33 | |
| 2S-GLRT2024.01 | 92.65 | 4.66 | 0.34 |