Human Interaction Recognition on UT
95Average AccuracyZhang et al. [56]
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al. [56]2017.06 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| Wang et al. [46]2017.06 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Co-LSTSM2017.06 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 90 | |
| Kong et al. [16]2017.06 | 93.33 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 90 | |
| Ke et al. [15]2017.06 | 93.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Raptis & Sigal [31]2017.06 | 93.3 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 80 | 90 | |
| Kong et al. [19]2017.06 | 91.67 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 80 | 90 | 90 | |
| Shariat & Pavlovic [36]2017.06 | 91.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Two CNN+LSTM2017.06 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 80 | |
| Kong et al. [18]2017.06 | 88.33 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| Ryoo [32]2017.06 | 85 | 80 | 90 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 80 | |
| Donahue et al. [8]2017.06 | 85 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 80 | |
| One CNN+LSTM2017.06 | 85 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 80 | |
| Yu et al. [53]2017.06 | 83.33 | 100 | 65 | 100 | 85 | 75 | 75 | |
| Person-box CNN2017.06 | 81.67 | 90 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | |
| Ryoo et al. [34]2017.06 | 70.8 | 75 | 87.5 | 62.5 | 50 | 75 | 75 |