Entity Typing on Ultra-Fine Entity Typing (test) benchmark leaderboard · SOTA2 Research

Entity Typing on Ultra-Fine Entity Typing (test)

59.3PrecisionPL-BERT-LARGE

Evaluation Results

Method	Links
PL-BERT-LARGE2022.12		59.3	42.6	49.6
PL-BERT-BASE2022.12		57.8	40.7	47.7
DenoiseET2019.05		55.8	27.7	37
DFET2022.12		55.6	44.7	49.5
DenoiseET2019.05		55.5	26.3	35.7
PL-BERT-LARGE W/ NPCRF2022.12		55.3	46.7	50.6
LRN2022.12		54.5	38.9	45.4
MLMET2022.12		53.6	45.3	49.1
Vector2021.01		53	36.3	43.1
Box2021.01		52.8	38.8	44.8
BOX4TYPES2022.12		52.8	38.8	44.8
LITE+NLI+L2022.12		52.4	48.9	50.6
PL-BERT-BASE W/ NPCRF2022.12		52.1	47.5	49.7
BERT-Base, Uncased2019.05		51.6	33	40.2
BERT-base2021.01		51.6	33	40.2
DenoiseET2019.05		51.5	33	40.2
ELMo2021.01		51.5	33	40.2
LDET2022.12		51.5	33	40.1
LABELGCN-ROBERTA2022.12		51.2	41	45.5
LABELGCN2019.05		50.3	29.2	36.9
Label GCN2021.01		50.3	29.2	36.9
LABELGCN2022.12		50.3	29.2	36.9
LITE+L2022.12		48.7	45.8	47.2
MLC-ROBERTA W/ NPCRF2022.12		48.7	45.5	47
LABELGCN-ROBERTA W/ NPCRF2022.12		48.7	45.9	47.3
UFET-BILSTM2022.12		48.1	23.2	31.3
MLC-ROBERTA2022.12		47.8	40.4	43.8
DenoiseET2019.05		47.6	23.3	31.3
Choi et al. (2018)2019.05		47.1	24.2	32
Choi et al. (2018)2021.01		47.1	24.2	32