Classification on Synthetic Corrupted and Imbalanced Data
86AccuracyMAM
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 86 | 1 | |
| TSpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 83 | 4 | |
| MAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 82 | 3 | |
| SAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 80 | 5 | |
| SpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 79 | 6 | |
| TSpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 78 | 4 | |
| SAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 76 | 7 | |
| SpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 71 | 8 | |
| MAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 71 | 5 | |
| MAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 70 | 5 | |
| SpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 68 | 9 | |
| TSpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 68 | 7 | |
| TSpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 66 | 8 | |
| SAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 64 | 5 | |
| SpAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 62 | 11 | |
| SAMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 60 | 7 | |
| ℓ1-SVMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 50 | 1 | |
| ℓ1-SVMcorrupted ratio (r1)=10%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 50 | 1 | |
| ℓ1-SVMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=15%2026.04 | 50 | 2 | |
| ℓ1-SVMcorrupted ratio (r1)=30%, imbalanced factor (r2)=10%2026.04 | 50 | 1 |