Authorship Attribution on PAN19-P1
85.9AccuracyTIACBM
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TIACBMModel=GPT-2, Fine-Tuning Strategy=TIACBM (ours)2025.02 | 85.9 | 73.44 | |
| Ankner et al. (2024)Model=GPT-2, Fine-Tuning Strategy=Ankner et al. (2024)2025.02 | 83.76 | 68.7 | |
| ConventionalModel=GPT-2, Fine-Tuning Strategy=Conventional2025.02 | 82.78 | 67.96 | |
| Cyclic DecayingModel=GPT-2, Fine-Tuning Strategy=Cyclic Decaying2025.02 | 82.38 | 67.34 | |
| Poesina et al. (2024)Model=GPT-2, Fine-Tuning Strategy=Poesina et al. (2024)2025.02 | 72.44 | 57.6 | |
| ConstantModel=GPT-2, Fine-Tuning Strategy=Constant2025.02 | 59.1 | 41.58 |