Adversarial Attack on Image Explanations on COCO 2017 (test)
50IoUX-Shift
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X-ShiftBackbone=ViT-B/32, Perturbation budget (ε)=4/255, Optimization steps=4002026.05 | 50 | 95.49 | 0.0003 | 0 | |
| FGSM-TBackbone=ViT-B/32, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 38.46 | 43.43 | 0.0014 | 100 | |
| X-ShiftBackbone=ViT-L/14, Perturbation budget (ε)=4/255, Optimization steps=4002026.05 | 22.5 | 87.36 | 0.0003 | 0 | |
| FGSM-UBackbone=ViT-L/14, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 19.51 | 44.47 | 0.0016 | 100 | |
| FGSM-TBackbone=ViT-L/14, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 18.07 | 47.32 | 0.0015 | 100 | |
| PGD-UBackbone=ViT-L/14, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 18.07 | 29.08 | 0.0045 | 100 | |
| PGD-TBackbone=ViT-L/14, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 15.29 | 18.53 | 0.0061 | 100 | |
| PGD-TBackbone=ViT-B/32, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 12.5 | 11.54 | 0.0041 | 100 | |
| FGSM-UBackbone=ViT-B/32, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 5.88 | 43.04 | 0.0014 | 100 | |
| PGD-UBackbone=ViT-B/32, Perturbation budget (ε)=128/255, Optimization steps=5002026.05 | 5.88 | 48.86 | 0.0029 | 100 |