3D Human Pose Estimation on Human 3.6M Subjects 9 & 11 (test)
35.6MPJPECi et al.
Evaluation results
| Method | Links | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ci et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=2002026.02 | 35.6 | 30.5 | |
| Flexible Geometric GuidanceTraining Supervision=3D Only, Number of Hypotheses (M)=2002026.02 | 42.3 | 34.4 | |
| Holmquist et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=2002026.02 | 43.3 | 32 | |
| Wehrbein et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=2002026.02 | 44.3 | 32.4 | |
| Flexible Geometric GuidanceTraining Supervision=3D Only, Number of Hypotheses (M)=502026.02 | 46.3 | 37.3 | |
| Sharma et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=2002026.02 | 46.8 | 37.3 | |
| Gong et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=52026.02 | 49.7 | 31.6 | |
| Jiang et al.Training Supervision=3D Only, Number of Hypotheses (M)=502026.02 | 51.4 | 42.1 | |
| Li et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=52026.02 | 52.7 | 42.6 | |
| Fan et al.Training Supervision=3D Only2026.02 | 61.5 | 48.2 | |
| Martinez et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D2026.02 | 62.9 | 47.7 | |
| Jiang et al.Training Supervision=3D Only, Number of Hypotheses (M)=12026.02 | 65.7 | 49 | |
| Li et al.Training Supervision=Paired 2D-3D, Number of Hypotheses (M)=102026.02 | 73.9 | 44.3 | |
| GuTraining Supervision=3D Only2026.02 | 77.2 | — | |
| Flexible Geometric GuidanceTraining Supervision=3D Only, Number of Hypotheses (M)=12026.02 | 78.6 | 58.2 | |
| Bogo et al.Training Supervision=3D Only2026.02 | 82.3 | — | |
| Song et al.Training Supervision=3D Only2026.02 | — | 56.4 |