M&Ms
Benchmarks
Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrendResults
M&Ms (2.5% labeled)
85.36Dice
8
M&Ms 5% Labeled
81.71Accuracy (Domain A)
8
M&Ms 2% Labeled
0.796Domain A Performance
8
M&Ms Target Domain D 100 volumes (Canon)
92.75Dice - LV
7
M&Ms Target Domain C (GE) 150 volumes
88.92Dice (LV)
7
M&Ms Target Domain B Philips 192 volumes
90.92Dice LV
7
M&Ms 1 (test and train)
1.28Average Score
6
M&Ms 100% labeled (target domain (leave-one-out))
0.86Dice Score
6
M&Ms 5% labeled (target domain (leave-one-out))
82.12Dice Coefficient
6
M&Ms target domain 2% labeled (leave-one-out)
78.43Dice
6
M&Ms (Full)
31.2Image Quality Score
6
M&Ms-2 (train)
0.77Overall Error
5
M&Ms SAX
88.19Dice Score (RV)
5
M&Ms2 SAX+LAX
35.08Accuracy
5
M&Ms SAX
32.89Accuracy
5
M&Ms Average (test)
14.53Hausdorff Distance
5
M&Ms Target Domain D (test)
12.72Hausdorff Distance
5
M&Ms Target Domain B (test)
14.82Hausdorff Distance
5
M&Ms Target Domain A (test)
17.28Hausdorff Distance
5
M&Ms Average 1.0
86.03Dice Score
5
M&Ms2 LAX 4C
91.67Dice Score (RV)
4
M&Ms
88.13DSC
4
M&Ms (Underrepresented Vendor)
84.7Dice Coefficient
3
M&Ms (Underrepresented Class)
85.2Dice Score
3