CIFAR100
Benchmarks
TaskDatasetSOTA resultTrendResults
CIFAR100 ID vs C sev 5 A OOD (test)
1AUROC
8
CIFAR100 (ID) vs CIFAR100-C sev 2 (W) (OOD) (test)
0.86AUROC
8
CIFAR100 (ID) vs CIFAR100-C sev 2 (A) (OOD) (test)
0.97AUROC
8
CIFAR100 10 clients (test)
68.15Test Accuracy
8
Long-Tailed CIFAR100 mu=0.01 (test)
37.94Accuracy
8
Long-Tailed CIFAR100 mu=0.1 (test)
56.78Accuracy
8
CIFAR100 mu=1 (test)
70.65Accuracy
8
CIFAR100 Noisy Non-IID
57.09Accuracy
7
CIFAR100-to-CIFAR100C (test)
29.8Mean Error
7
S-CIFAR100
64.7Accuracy (%)
7
CIFAR100
19.49Accuracy
7
CIFAR100 10-10
68.23Last Accuracy
7
CIFAR100-LT ID Texture (OOD)
83.88AUC
7
CIFAR100 B0 (10 steps) (non-rehearsal)
56.57Average Score
7
CIFAR100 (test)
77.44Accuracy
7
CIFAR100 (train)
0.926AUC
7
CIFAR100-LT Imbalance Ratio 10 uniform (test)
63.6Top-1 Accuracy
7
CIFAR100-LT Imbalance Ratio 10 (test)
72Top-1 Acc (IR=50)
7
Split-CIFAR100 (test)
62.79Accuracy
7
CIFAR100 IM=200 LT (test)
46.9Top-1 Acc
7
CIFAR100 Blurry10-Online (test)
41.35A5
7
CIFAR100 33 (test)
44.1Avg Accuracy
7
CIFAR100
27Retrieval Accuracy (R-A)
6
Cifar100 novel split
80.28LA Score
6
Cifar100 LT r10
43.2AUBC
6