CIFAR-100
Benchmarks
TaskDatasetSOTA resultTrendResults
CIFAR-100 LT IR 50 (val)
59.6Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 NASBench-201 (test)
0.65Kendall Tau Correlation
5
CIFAR-100 2k (test)
0.304Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 10% (train)
15.71FID
5
CIFAR-100 non-IID s=40
57.98Local Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 (test)
77.7Accuracy (Sym 20%)
5
CIFAR-100 (test)
55.7mAP (%)
5
CIFAR-100 40% Nearest noise
57.9Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 40% Mixed noise: A-20, S-20
60.6Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 40% Mixed noise: A-30, S-10
61.5Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 symmetric noise, all labels
74.2Accuracy
5
CIFAR-100 vs Texture (test)
43.87FPR @ 0.05 FNR
5
CIFAR-100 Clean AA Average aggregated (test)
25.63AURC (Average)
4
CIFAR-100 Long-tailed Imbalance, with Label Noise (test)
14.29Balanced Accuracy
4
CIFAR-100 (test val)
85.4Top-1 Accuracy
4
CIFAR-100 2-bit
18.67Accuracy (%)
4
CIFAR-100
62.87ASR (L-inf, 4/255)
4
CIFAR-100 (val)
64.75Best Top-1 Acc (%)
4
CIFAR-100 5000-sample half (test seed-42)
0.012ECE
4
CIFAR-100 (test)
44.3Accuracy (K=5)
4
CIFAR-100 (test)
0.663Accuracy
4
CIFAR-100 50% (test)
83.9Attack Success Rate (ASR)
4
CIFAR-100 NATS-Bench SS
70.86Accuracy
4
CIFAR-100 (test)
62.84Accuracy
4
CIFAR-100 (test)
0.875Spearman Rho vs EPJS
4