# Zero-shot Image Classification on ImageNet Robustness Variants and ObjectNet

Source: [Zero-shot Image Classification on ImageNet Robustness Variants and ObjectNet](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:35:20.384Z

Evaluation of zero-shot Image Classification performance across standard ImageNet, its robustness variants (v1, v2, A, R, S), and ObjectNet.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet and Robustness Variants zero-shot v1, v2, A, R, S, ObjectNet |
| Metric | Average Class Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Average Class Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=Average%20Class%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ImageNet Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=ImageNet%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ImageNet-v2 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=ImageNet-v2%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ObjectNet Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=ObjectNet%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ImageNet-A Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=ImageNet-A%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ImageNet-R Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=ImageNet-R%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ImageNet-S Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-image-classification-on-imagenet-robustness-variants-and-objectnet.md?metric=ImageNet-S%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Average Class Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ViT-L/14 Sparse | 75.6 | Not recorded | 697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a |
| ViT-L/14 baseline | 75.1 | Not recorded | 697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a |
| ViT-L/14 Sparse+ | 75.1 | Not recorded | 697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a |
| OpenAI ViT-B/32 | 57.5 | Not recorded | 697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a |
| Prisma ViT-B/32 cls@11 | 56.6 | Not recorded | 697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a |

### ViT-L/14 Sparse

Average Class Accuracy: 75.6. Result ID: 699784855698665ec4d975ac.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Sparsity":"0.66%","Evaluation":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ViT-L/14 baseline

Average Class Accuracy: 75.1. Result ID: 699784855698665ec4d975ab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Sparsity":"100%","Evaluation":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ViT-L/14 Sparse+

Average Class Accuracy: 75.1. Result ID: 699784855698665ec4d975ad.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Sparsity":"0.47%","Evaluation":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### OpenAI ViT-B/32

Average Class Accuracy: 57.5. Result ID: 699784855698665ec4d975a9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Sparsity":"100%","Evaluation":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Prisma ViT-B/32 cls@11

Average Class Accuracy: 56.6. Result ID: 699784855698665ec4d975aa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/697ae972a2b28e761d87cf4a.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79151e209131cea7c0cc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Sparsity":"2.8%","Evaluation":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
