# Zero-shot Image Classification on ImageNet All Source: [Zero-shot Image Classification on ImageNet All]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:45:20.629Z Evaluation of Zero-shot Image Classification performance on the ImageNet All dataset configuration, utilizing hierarchical and flat Hit@K metrics. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Zero-shot Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet All | | Metric | Flat Hit@1 | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 4 of 4 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Flat Hit@1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Flat Hit@2](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Flat Hit@5](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Flat Hit@10](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Flat Hit@20](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Hierarchical Precision@2](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Hierarchical Precision@5](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Hierarchical Precision@10](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Hierarchical Precision@20](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Flat Hit@1 | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oursstruct | 1.5 | Not recorded | 68fa62861e209131ce9f9e6e | | ConSE | 1.4 | Not recorded | 68fa62861e209131ce9f9e6e | | Ourso-vs-o | 1.4 | Not recorded | 68fa62861e209131ce9f9e6e | | ConSE by us | 1.3 | Not recorded | 68fa62861e209131ce9f9e6e | ### Oursstruct Flat Hit@1: 1.5. Result ID: 698bdaedecace47ef5592a9a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConSE Flat Hit@1: 1.4. Result ID: 698bdaedecace47ef5592a97. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Ourso-vs-o Flat Hit@1: 1.4. Result ID: 698bdaedecace47ef5592a99. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConSE by us Flat Hit@1: 1.3. Result ID: 698bdaedecace47ef5592a98. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"implementation":"re-implemented by authors"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.