# Zero-shot Classification on ImageNet 2-hops 2011 (test)

Source: [Zero-shot Classification on ImageNet 2-hops 2011 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-classification-on-imagenet-2-hops-2011-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:45:20.668Z

Evaluation of Zero-shot Classification performance on the test split of the ImageNet 2-hops 2011 dataset, measured using Flat Hit@K metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Zero-shot Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet 2-hops 2011 (test) |
| Metric | Flat Hit@1 |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Flat Hit@1](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-classification-on-imagenet-2-hops-2011-test.md?metric=Flat%20Hit%401>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Flat Hit@2](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-classification-on-imagenet-2-hops-2011-test.md?metric=Flat%20Hit%402>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Flat Hit@5](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-classification-on-imagenet-2-hops-2011-test.md?metric=Flat%20Hit%405>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Flat Hit@10](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-classification-on-imagenet-2-hops-2011-test.md?metric=Flat%20Hit%4010>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Flat Hit@20](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/zero-shot-classification-on-imagenet-2-hops-2011-test.md?metric=Flat%20Hit%4020>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Flat Hit@1 | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ConSE | 9.4 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| ConSE | 9.3 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| ConSE | 9.2 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| DeViSE | 6 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| DeViSE | 0.8 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| ConSE | 0.3 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| ConSE | 0.3 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |
| ConSE | 0.2 | Not recorded | 68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb |

### ConSE

Flat Hit@1: 9.4. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a73.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"T":10,"# Candidate Labels":"1,589","Include training labels":"No"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConSE

Flat Hit@1: 9.3. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a72.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"T":1,"# Candidate Labels":"1,589","Include training labels":"No"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConSE

Flat Hit@1: 9.2. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a74.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"T":1000,"# Candidate Labels":"1,589","Include training labels":"No"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DeViSE

Flat Hit@1: 6. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a71.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Candidate Labels":"1,589","Include training labels":"No"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DeViSE

Flat Hit@1: 0.8. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a75.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Candidate Labels":"2,589","Include training labels":"Yes (+1K)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConSE

Flat Hit@1: 0.3. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a77.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"T":10,"# Candidate Labels":"2,589","Include training labels":"Yes (+1K)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConSE

Flat Hit@1: 0.3. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a78.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"T":1000,"# Candidate Labels":"2,589","Include training labels":"Yes (+1K)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConSE

Flat Hit@1: 0.2. Result ID: 698bea25ecace47ef55a1a76.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa632f1e209131ce9fd1fb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"T":1,"# Candidate Labels":"2,589","Include training labels":"Yes (+1K)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.