# Whole-Slide Image Classification on TCGA HNSC (3-fold cross-validated)

Source: [Whole-Slide Image Classification on TCGA HNSC (3-fold cross-validated)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/whole-slide-image-classification-on-tcga-hnsc-3-fold-cross-validated>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-24T12:54:44.573Z

Evaluation of Whole Slide Image classification performance on the TCGA HNSC cohort using 3-fold cross-validation, reporting ROC-AUC.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Whole-Slide Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | TCGA HNSC (3-fold cross-validated) |
| Metric | ROC-AUC |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [ROC-AUC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/whole-slide-image-classification-on-tcga-hnsc-3-fold-cross-validated.md?metric=ROC-AUC>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | ROC-AUC | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Graph-ABMIL + Jigsaw | 83.3 | Not recorded | 69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e |
| Graph-MIL | 83 | Not recorded | 69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e |
| ABMIL+Jigsaw | 82 | Not recorded | 69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e |
| Graph-ABMIL | 81 | Not recorded | 69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e |
| ABMIL | 80.9 | Not recorded | 69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e |

### Graph-ABMIL + Jigsaw

ROC-AUC: 83.3. Result ID: 69c2891847f34ce924aa9cc6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Embeddings":"UNI","Validation":"3-fold cross-validated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Graph-MIL

ROC-AUC: 83. Result ID: 69c2891847f34ce924aa9cc4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Embeddings":"UNI","Validation":"3-fold cross-validated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ABMIL+Jigsaw

ROC-AUC: 82. Result ID: 69c2891847f34ce924aa9cc3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Embeddings":"UNI","Validation":"3-fold cross-validated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Graph-ABMIL

ROC-AUC: 81. Result ID: 69c2891847f34ce924aa9cc5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Embeddings":"UNI","Validation":"3-fold cross-validated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ABMIL

ROC-AUC: 80.9. Result ID: 69c2891847f34ce924aa9cc2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c21a8c0636e5bf4afc485e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64861e209131cea052eb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Embeddings":"UNI","Validation":"3-fold cross-validated"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.