# Watermarked Image Quality Assessment on ImageNet Diffusion

Source: [Watermarked Image Quality Assessment on ImageNet Diffusion](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermarked-image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet-diffusion>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:03:24.555Z

Evaluation of image quality assessment performance on images generated by the ImageNet Diffusion model, using objective metrics like PSNR, SSIM, and perceptual metrics like CLIP and FID.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Watermarked Image Quality Assessment |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Diffusion |
| Metric | SSIM |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [SSIM](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermarked-image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet-diffusion.md?metric=SSIM>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [PSNR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermarked-image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet-diffusion.md?metric=PSNR>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [MS-SSIM](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermarked-image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet-diffusion.md?metric=MS-SSIM>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [CLIP Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermarked-image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet-diffusion.md?metric=CLIP%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [FID](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermarked-image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet-diffusion.md?metric=FID>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | SSIM | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| W/o watermark | 1 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f |
| ROBIN | 0.875 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f |
| Tree-Ring | 0.663 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f |

### W/o watermark

SSIM: 1. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e35.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7552f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Generative Model":"ImageNet Diffusion \[2\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ROBIN

SSIM: 0.875. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e37.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7552f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7552f.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Hannah1102/ROBIN>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Generative Model":"ImageNet Diffusion \[2\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Tree-Ring

SSIM: 0.663. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e36.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c91e209131cea7552f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70001e209131cea4872a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Generative Model":"ImageNet Diffusion \[2\]"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.