# Watermark verification on ImageNet Diffusion Source: [Watermark verification on ImageNet Diffusion]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:12.581Z Evaluation of watermark verification performance on the ImageNet Diffusion dataset, reporting accuracy metrics across various common image transformations (e.g., blur, noise, compression) and overall average performance. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Watermark verification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Diffusion | | Metric | Accuracy (Clean) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 5 of 5 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (Clean)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Blur)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Noise)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (JPEG)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Brightness)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Rotation)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Crop)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Avg)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Latency (s)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (Clean) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | DwtDctSvd | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f | | RivaGAN | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f | | ROBIN | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f | | Tree-Ring | 99.9 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f | | DwtDct | 89.9 | Not recorded | 68fa77c91e209131cea7552f | ### DwtDctSvd Accuracy (Clean): 100. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e1f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Processing Category":"Post-processing"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RivaGAN Accuracy (Clean): 100. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e20. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Processing Category":"Post-processing"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ROBIN Accuracy (Clean): 100. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e22. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Processing Category":"In-processing"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Tree-Ring Accuracy (Clean): 99.9. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e21. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Processing Category":"In-processing"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DwtDct Accuracy (Clean): 89.9. Result ID: 6995695c3badfaffe65d2e1e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Processing Category":"Post-processing"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.