# Watermark Removal on Stable Signature

Source: [Watermark Removal on Stable Signature](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-removal-on-stable-signature>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-04T09:14:19.059Z

Evaluation of image quality and watermark removal effectiveness on the Stable Signature dataset, using metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and FID.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Watermark Removal |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Stable Signature |
| Metric | T@1%F Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [T@1%F Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-removal-on-stable-signature.md?metric=T%401%25F%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [PSNR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-removal-on-stable-signature.md?metric=PSNR>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [SSIM](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-removal-on-stable-signature.md?metric=SSIM>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FID](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-removal-on-stable-signature.md?metric=FID>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | T@1%F Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Watermarked | 100 | Not recorded | 69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd |
| Regen | 0 | Not recorded | 69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd |
| Rinse | 0 | Not recorded | 69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd |
| Ours | 0 | Not recorded | 69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd |

### Watermarked

T@1%F Score: 100. Result ID: 69a7f68b6dbb7075b94cff1a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Regen

T@1%F Score: 0. Result ID: 69a7f68b6dbb7075b94cff1b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa757a1e209131cea68378.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/XuandongZhao/WatermarkAttacker>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Rinse

T@1%F Score: 0. Result ID: 69a7f68b6dbb7075b94cff1c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa738f1e209131cea5d37d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ours

T@1%F Score: 0. Result ID: 69a7f68b6dbb7075b94cff1d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69a66bde2d603e6de3e3cccd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.