# Watermark Extraction on MS-COCO 2017 (test) Source: [Watermark Extraction on MS-COCO 2017 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:39:18.204Z Evaluation of Watermark Extraction performance on the test split of the MS-COCO 2017 dataset, reporting metrics such as Clean Accuracy, Adversarial Accuracy, and Payload Rate. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Watermark Extraction | | Dataset (including any stated split) | MS-COCO 2017 (test) | | Metric | Clean Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Clean Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Adversarial Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Payload Rate](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Clean Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | GS | 100 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | OSI | 100 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | OSI | 99.97 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | GS | 99.92 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | OSI | 95.9 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | GS | 94.73 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | OSI | 88.15 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | | GS | 86.52 | Not recorded | 698c0d4cc97a0b3e3b5e1304 | ### GS Clean Accuracy: 100. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da97c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":8}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OSI Clean Accuracy: 100. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da980. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":8}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OSI Clean Accuracy: 99.97. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da97f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":4}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GS Clean Accuracy: 99.92. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da97b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":4}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OSI Clean Accuracy: 95.9. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da97e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":2}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GS Clean Accuracy: 94.73. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da97a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":2}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OSI Clean Accuracy: 88.15. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da97d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":1}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GS Clean Accuracy: 86.52. Result ID: 69971f7e5698665ec46da979. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"f\_hw":1}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.