# Watermark Detection on ELI5 and ICLR papers IPI setting

Source: [Watermark Detection on ELI5 and ICLR papers IPI setting](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-detection-on-eli5-and-iclr-papers-ipi-setting>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-07T07:15:45.782Z

Evaluation of Watermark Detection performance on a combined dataset consisting of ELI5 examples and ICLR papers evaluated under the IPI setting, using metrics like ROC-AUC and True Positive Rate at specific False Positive thresholds (T@1%F, T@10%F).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Watermark Detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ELI5 and ICLR papers IPI setting |
| Metric | ROC-AUC |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [ROC-AUC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-detection-on-eli5-and-iclr-papers-ipi-setting.md?metric=ROC-AUC>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [TPR @ 1% FPR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-detection-on-eli5-and-iclr-papers-ipi-setting.md?metric=TPR%20%40%201%25%20FPR>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [TPR @ 10% FPR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/watermark-detection-on-eli5-and-iclr-papers-ipi-setting.md?metric=TPR%20%40%2010%25%20FPR>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | ROC-AUC | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Unicode ICW | 1 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Initials ICW | 0.997 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Lexical ICW | 0.997 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Acrostics ICW | 0.997 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Lexical ICW | 0.889 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Unicode ICW | 0.857 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Initials ICW | 0.62 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |
| Acrostics ICW | 0.592 | Not recorded | 68fa78b31e209131cea79d68 |

### Unicode ICW

ROC-AUC: 1. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06ad.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-o3-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Initials ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.997. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06ae.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-o3-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Lexical ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.997. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06af.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-o3-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Acrostics ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.997. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06b0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-o3-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Lexical ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.889. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06ab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-4o-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Unicode ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.857. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06a9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-4o-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Initials ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.62. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06aa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-4o-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Acrostics ICW

ROC-AUC: 0.592. Result ID: 69d4aead47f34ce924bc06ac.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78b31e209131cea79d68.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Language Model":"GPT-4o-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
