# Visual Task Planning and Graph Learning on Fruit-4x6

Source: [Visual Task Planning and Graph Learning on Fruit-4x6](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-task-planning-and-graph-learning-on-fruit-4x6>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-23T10:14:02.346Z

Evaluation of Visual Task Planning and Graph Learning performance on the Fruit-4x6 dataset, using Opt, Any, TransPrec, and TransCov metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Visual Task Planning and Graph Learning |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Fruit-4x6 |
| Metric | Opt Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Opt Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-task-planning-and-graph-learning-on-fruit-4x6.md?metric=Opt%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Any Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-task-planning-and-graph-learning-on-fruit-4x6.md?metric=Any%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Translational Precision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-task-planning-and-graph-learning-on-fruit-4x6.md?metric=Translational%20Precision>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Translational Coverage](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-task-planning-and-graph-learning-on-fruit-4x6.md?metric=Translational%20Coverage>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Opt Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VGGC | 78.1 | Not recorded | 68fa7b611e209131cea88090 |
| LSR | 37.5 | Not recorded | 68fa7b611e209131cea88090 |
| PCA–HDB-RM | 33.4 | Not recorded | 68fa7b611e209131cea88090 |

### VGGC

Opt Rate: 78.1. Result ID: 69c1115d47f34ce924a90ba2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b611e209131cea88090.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b611e209131cea88090.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LSR

Opt Rate: 37.5. Result ID: 69c1115d47f34ce924a90ba0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b611e209131cea88090.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ce71e209131cea36a75.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA–HDB-RM

Opt Rate: 33.4. Result ID: 69c1115d47f34ce924a90ba1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b611e209131cea88090.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.