# Visual Question Answering on VizWiz-QA (test)

Source: [Visual Question Answering on VizWiz-QA (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-vizwiz-qa-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-27T07:50:24.305Z

Evaluation of Visual Question Answering performance on the test split of the VizWiz-QA dataset, measured by Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Visual Question Answering |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | VizWiz-QA (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-vizwiz-qa-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GIT2 | 70.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23 |
| GIT | 67.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23 |
| Flamingo | 65.4 | Not recorded | 68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23 |
| Liu et al. (2021)## | 60.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23 |

### GIT2

Accuracy: 70.1. Result ID: 69a14cb635dfcabb00e61655.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"5.1B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GIT

Accuracy: 67.5. Result ID: 69a14cb635dfcabb00e61654.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Parameters":"0.7B"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Flamingo

Accuracy: 65.4. Result ID: 69a14cb635dfcabb00e61653.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e031e209131cea3d674.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Liu et al. (2021)##

Accuracy: 60.6. Result ID: 69a14cb635dfcabb00e61652.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e401e209131cea3eb23.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.