# Visual Question Answering on RoboFine-Bench (test)

Source: [Visual Question Answering on RoboFine-Bench (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-27T10:21:11.681Z

Evaluation of model performance on the test split of the RoboFine-Bench dataset for Visual Question Answering, reporting detailed metrics including Overall, Actor/Object interactions, and Configuration success rates.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Visual Question Answering |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | RoboFine-Bench (test) |
| Metric | Overall Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Overall Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=Overall%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AA (Active Actor) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=AA%20(Active%20Actor)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [TO (Target Object) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=TO%20(Target%20Object)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [IC (Initial Configuration) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=IC%20(Initial%20Configuration)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AS (Action Sequence) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=AS%20(Action%20Sequence)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [C&A (Contact & Approach) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=C%26A%20(Contact%20%26%20Approach)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [T&O (Trajectory & Orientation) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=T%26O%20(Trajectory%20%26%20Orientation)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [BM (Body Motion) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=BM%20(Body%20Motion)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [OI (Object Interaction) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=OI%20(Object%20Interaction)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FC (Final Configuration) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=FC%20(Final%20Configuration)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F&R (Failure & Recovery) Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-robofine-bench-test.md?metric=F%26R%20(Failure%20%26%20Recovery)%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Overall Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RoboFine-VLM | 71 | Not recorded | 6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4 |
| Gemini-3.1-Pro | 62.1 | Not recorded | 6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4 |
| GPT-5.4 | 61 | Not recorded | 6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4 |
| Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro | 54.9 | Not recorded | 6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4 |
| Qwen3.5-Plus | 52.6 | Not recorded | 6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4 |
| Qwen3-VL-Plus | 50.4 | Not recorded | 6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4 |

### RoboFine-VLM

Overall Accuracy: 71. Result ID: 6a16c48cfbc373592c1085ed.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gemini-3.1-Pro

Overall Accuracy: 62.1. Result ID: 6a16c48cfbc373592c1085eb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GPT-5.4

Overall Accuracy: 61. Result ID: 6a16c48cfbc373592c1085ec.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro

Overall Accuracy: 54.9. Result ID: 6a16c48cfbc373592c1085ea.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen3.5-Plus

Overall Accuracy: 52.6. Result ID: 6a16c48cfbc373592c1085e9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen3-VL-Plus

Overall Accuracy: 50.4. Result ID: 6a16c48cfbc373592c1085e8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a167ad7dbd7150506f802e4.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6927db54d6b0dd3342930f66.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
