# Visual Question Answering on GQA (Relative Accuracy Drop %)

Source: [Visual Question Answering on GQA (Relative Accuracy Drop %)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-gqa-relative-accuracy-drop-percent>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-21T12:18:06.381Z

Evaluation of model performance on the GQA dataset for visual question answering, specifically reporting the relative performance drop percentage in accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Visual Question Answering |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | GQA |
| Metric | Relative Accuracy Drop (%) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Relative Accuracy Drop (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/visual-question-answering-on-gqa-relative-accuracy-drop-percent.md?metric=Relative%20Accuracy%20Drop%20(%25)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Relative Accuracy Drop (%) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HONES | 0.62 | Not recorded | 69e704d47d0172140ec7efea |
| HONES | 1.2 | Not recorded | 69e704d47d0172140ec7efea |
| HONES | 6.9 | Not recorded | 69e704d47d0172140ec7efea |
| HONES | 36.5 | Not recorded | 69e704d47d0172140ec7efea |

### HONES

Relative Accuracy Drop (%): 0.62. Result ID: 69e76af147f34ce924cef705.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Masked neuron group":"Gen."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HONES

Relative Accuracy Drop (%): 1.2. Result ID: 69e76af147f34ce924cef704.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Masked neuron group":"Triple"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HONES

Relative Accuracy Drop (%): 6.9. Result ID: 69e76af147f34ce924cef702.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Masked neuron group":"Spec."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HONES

Relative Accuracy Drop (%): 36.5. Result ID: 69e76af147f34ce924cef703.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e704d47d0172140ec7efea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Masked neuron group":"Pair (VQA+Retrieval)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.