# Turing Test on Scientific Paper Abstracts (test)

Source: [Turing Test on Scientific Paper Abstracts (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/turing-test-on-scientific-paper-abstracts-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:53:39.994Z

Evaluation of model performance in a Turing Test setting using abstracts from scientific papers (test split), categorized by domain expertise (CS vs Non-CS) and reviewer seniority (Junior vs Senior).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Turing Test |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Scientific Paper Abstracts (test) |
| Metric | Non-CS Success Rate |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Non-CS Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/turing-test-on-scientific-paper-abstracts-test.md?metric=Non-CS%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [CS Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/turing-test-on-scientific-paper-abstracts-test.md?metric=CS%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Junior Reviewer Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/turing-test-on-scientific-paper-abstracts-test.md?metric=Junior%20Reviewer%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Senior Reviewer Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/turing-test-on-scientific-paper-abstracts-test.md?metric=Senior%20Reviewer%20Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Non-CS Success Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Writing-editing Network | 0.8 | Not recorded | 68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc |
| Writing-editing Network | 0.75 | Not recorded | 68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc |
| Writing-editing Network | 0.6 | Not recorded | 68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc |
| Writing-editing Network | 0.54 | Not recorded | 68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc |
| Writing-editing Network | 0.3 | Not recorded | 68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc |

### Writing-editing Network

Non-CS Success Rate: 0.8. Result ID: 698d7c778b517eb43321de9a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/EagleW/Writing-editing-Network>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Tests":"10","# Choices per Test":"10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Writing-editing Network

Non-CS Success Rate: 0.75. Result ID: 698d7c778b517eb43321de9c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/EagleW/Writing-editing-Network>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Tests":"20","# Choices per Test":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Writing-editing Network

Non-CS Success Rate: 0.6. Result ID: 698d7c778b517eb43321de99.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/EagleW/Writing-editing-Network>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Tests":"20","# Choices per Test":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Writing-editing Network

Non-CS Success Rate: 0.54. Result ID: 698d7c778b517eb43321de9b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/EagleW/Writing-editing-Network>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Tests":"50","# Choices per Test":"2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Writing-editing Network

Non-CS Success Rate: 0.3. Result ID: 698d7c778b517eb43321de98.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a81e209131cea1d7bc.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/EagleW/Writing-editing-Network>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# Tests":"50","# Choices per Test":"2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.