# Text-to-image retrieval on COCO sports subset 10% labeled

Source: [Text-to-image retrieval on COCO sports subset 10% labeled](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-to-image-retrieval-on-coco-sports-subset-10-percent-labeled>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:02:10.952Z

Evaluation of Text-to-Image Retrieval performance using the 10% labeled sports subset of the COCO dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Text-to-image retrieval |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | COCO sports subset 10% labeled |
| Metric | Retrieval Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Retrieval Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-to-image-retrieval-on-coco-sports-subset-10-percent-labeled.md?metric=Retrieval%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Retrieval Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S-CLIP | 48.4 | Not recorded | 68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e |
| CLIP | 47.76 | Not recorded | 68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e |
| Soft-PL | 47.23 | Not recorded | 68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e |
| Hard-PL | 47.12 | Not recorded | 68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e |
| CLIP | 38.17 | Not recorded | 68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e |

### S-CLIP

Retrieval Score: 48.4. Result ID: 69918ecf3a6c31484908f756.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/alinlab/s-clip>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Labeling strategy":"Optimal Transport"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CLIP

Retrieval Score: 47.76. Result ID: 69918ecf3a6c31484908f753.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training protocol":"fine-tune"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Soft-PL

Retrieval Score: 47.23. Result ID: 69918ecf3a6c31484908f755.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a721e209131cea282ca.md>)

[Implementation](<https://www.sota2.com/github.com/facebookresearch/suncet>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Labeling strategy":"Soft Pseudo-Labeling"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Hard-PL

Retrieval Score: 47.12. Result ID: 69918ecf3a6c31484908f754.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Labeling strategy":"Hard Pseudo-Labeling"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CLIP

Retrieval Score: 38.17. Result ID: 69918ecf3a6c31484908f752.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71091e209131cea4ec5e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training protocol":"original"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.