# Text-line extraction on DIVA-HisDB

Source: [Text-line extraction on DIVA-HisDB](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-line-extraction-on-diva-hisdb>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:48:37.092Z

Evaluation of Text-line extraction performance on the DIVA-HisDB dataset, typically measured using Intersection over Union (IU) metrics for lines and pixels.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Text-line extraction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | DIVA-HisDB |
| Metric | Line IU |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Line IU](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-line-extraction-on-diva-hisdb.md?metric=Line%20IU>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Pixel IU](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-line-extraction-on-diva-hisdb.md?metric=Pixel%20IU>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Line IU | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PROPOSED METHOD | 99.42 | Not recorded | 68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e |
| WAVELENGTH (TIGHT POLYGONS) | 97.86 | Not recorded | 68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e |
| CITLAB ARGUS LINEDETECT | 96.99 | Not recorded | 68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e |
| BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY | 81.5 | Not recorded | 68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e |
| WAVELENGTH | 68.58 | Not recorded | 68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e |

### PROPOSED METHOD

Line IU: 99.42. Result ID: 698cd31d8b517eb4331cff4e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/DIVA-DIA/Text-Line-Segmentation-Method-for-Medieval-Manuscripts>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Semantic Segmentation Pre-processing":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### WAVELENGTH (TIGHT POLYGONS)

Line IU: 97.86. Result ID: 698cd31d8b517eb4331cff4d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Semantic Segmentation Pre-processing":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CITLAB ARGUS LINEDETECT

Line IU: 96.99. Result ID: 698cd31d8b517eb4331cff4c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Semantic Segmentation Pre-processing":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY

Line IU: 81.5. Result ID: 698cd31d8b517eb4331cff4b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Semantic Segmentation Pre-processing":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### WAVELENGTH

Line IU: 68.58. Result ID: 698cd31d8b517eb4331cff4a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65f41e209131cea0d65e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Semantic Segmentation Pre-processing":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.