# Text-guided Image Manipulation on Human Face images with 10 text conditions (test)

Source: [Text-guided Image Manipulation on Human Face images with 10 text conditions (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-guided-image-manipulation-on-human-face-images-with-10-text-conditions-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:04:51.134Z

Evaluation of Text-guided Image Manipulation performance on a specific test set of human face images conditioned on 10 text prompts, measured by Style and Content fidelity.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Text-guided Image Manipulation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Human Face images with 10 text conditions (test) |
| Metric | Style Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Style Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-guided-image-manipulation-on-human-face-images-with-10-text-conditions-test.md?metric=Style%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Content Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/text-guided-image-manipulation-on-human-face-images-with-10-text-conditions-test.md?metric=Content%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Style Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CLIPstyler | 3.78 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |
| AdaIN+CLIP | 3.32 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |
| Retrieve + Sty | 3.01 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |
| Text2Image + Sty | 2.8 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |
| VQGAN+CLIP | 2.75 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |
| StyleGAN-NADA | 2.66 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |
| StyleCLIP | 1.47 | Not recorded | 68fa6c131e209131cea31f77 |

### CLIPstyler

Style Score: 3.78. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11897.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/cyclomon/CLIPstyler>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### AdaIN+CLIP

Style Score: 3.32. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11895.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa638b1e209131ce9ff74f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Retrieve + Sty

Style Score: 3.01. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11891.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Text2Image + Sty

Style Score: 2.8. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11892.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68281e209131cea1a5e8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VQGAN+CLIP

Style Score: 2.75. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11896.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a371e209131cea26a4d.md>)

[Implementation](<https://git.io/JnyvK>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### StyleGAN-NADA

Style Score: 2.66. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11894.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b801e209131cea2ea9e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### StyleCLIP

Style Score: 1.47. Result ID: 698ec81fffc3901de0a11893.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c131e209131cea31f77.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69ae1e209131cea23537.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.