# TCM clinical reasoning and prescription evaluation on 1,000 clinical cases (val)

Source: [TCM clinical reasoning and prescription evaluation on 1,000 clinical cases (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-10T13:00:55.762Z

Evaluation of model performance on 1,000 clinical cases (validation set) focusing on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical reasoning, pathology logic, and prescription evaluation.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | TCM clinical reasoning and prescription evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | 1,000 clinical cases (val) |
| Metric | Total Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Total Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val.md?metric=Total%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Reasoning Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val.md?metric=Reasoning%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Dialectical Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val.md?metric=Dialectical%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Pathology Logic Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val.md?metric=Pathology%20Logic%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Prescription Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val.md?metric=Prescription%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Explicability Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/tcm-clinical-reasoning-and-prescription-evaluation-on-1-000-clinical-cases-val.md?metric=Explicability%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Total Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CORE-Acu | 42.96 | Not recorded | 69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1 |
| GLM-4.6 | 42.26 | Not recorded | 69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1 |
| Qwen-Max | 36.88 | Not recorded | 69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1 |
| GPT-4o | 36.73 | Not recorded | 69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1 |
| Qwen3-8B | 29.06 | Not recorded | 69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1 |
| HuatuoGPT | 20 | Not recorded | 69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1 |

### CORE-Acu

Total Score: 42.96. Result ID: 69b015f16dbb7075b95a1ac1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"protocol":"LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-5.2)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GLM-4.6

Total Score: 42.26. Result ID: 69b015f16dbb7075b95a1abf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"protocol":"LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-5.2)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen-Max

Total Score: 36.88. Result ID: 69b015f16dbb7075b95a1abd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"protocol":"LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-5.2)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GPT-4o

Total Score: 36.73. Result ID: 69b015f16dbb7075b95a1abc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"protocol":"LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-5.2)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen3-8B

Total Score: 29.06. Result ID: 69b015f16dbb7075b95a1abe.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"protocol":"LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-5.2)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HuatuoGPT

Total Score: 20. Result ID: 69b015f16dbb7075b95a1ac0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa5bc2d603e6de3e43ec1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f7c1e209131cea45e88.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"protocol":"LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-5.2)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.