# Task Execution on TEXTCRAFT-SYNTH 8K context Hard (evaluation set)

Source: [Task Execution on TEXTCRAFT-SYNTH 8K context Hard (evaluation set)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/task-execution-on-textcraft-synth-8k-context-hard-evaluation-set>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-08T11:42:23.688Z

Evaluation of agent performance on Task Execution within the TEXTCRAFT-SYNTH 8K environment, specifically focusing on the Hard context subset, measured by Success Rate (SR), Steps taken, and Time taken.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Task Execution |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | TEXTCRAFT-SYNTH 8K context Hard (evaluation set) |
| Metric | Success Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Success Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/task-execution-on-textcraft-synth-8k-context-hard-evaluation-set.md?metric=Success%20Rate>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Steps Taken](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/task-execution-on-textcraft-synth-8k-context-hard-evaluation-set.md?metric=Steps%20Taken>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Time (s)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/task-execution-on-textcraft-synth-8k-context-hard-evaluation-set.md?metric=Time%20(s)>): Lower is better; unit: TIME.

## Recorded results

| Method | Success Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Recursive | 88 | Not recorded | 69fd6e645497b3b670c897cd |
| Single | 0 | Not recorded | 69fd6e645497b3b670c897cd |

### Recursive

Success Rate: 88. Result ID: 69fdcc0e47f34ce924e1d04a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6e645497b3b670c897cd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6e645497b3b670c897cd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Context Window":"8K train, 8K eval"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Single

Success Rate: 0. Result ID: 69fdcc0e47f34ce924e1d049.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6e645497b3b670c897cd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Context Window":"8K train, 8K eval"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.