# Talking Face Emotion Editing on User Study Extended Emotion Source: [Talking Face Emotion Editing on User Study Extended Emotion]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-10T08:06:43.440Z Evaluation of models performing Talking Face Emotion Editing using the User Study Extended Emotion dataset, assessed via metrics covering emotional accuracy, visual fidelity, and lip synchronization. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Talking Face Emotion Editing | | Dataset (including any stated split) | User Study Extended Emotion | | Metric | Emotional Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 12 of 12 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Emotional Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Visual Quality](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lip Synchronization](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Emotional Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | C-MET | 91 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | C-MET | 86.9 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | C-MET | 80.4 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | C-MET | 51.2 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | EDTalk | 36.5 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | EAT | 17.1 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | Tie | 12.2 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | FLOAT | 11.8 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | EAMM | 6.7 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | Tie | 2.4 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | Tie | 2.2 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | | Tie | 1.2 | Not recorded | 69d883f47d0172140ec7791c | ### C-MET Emotional Accuracy: 91. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fe7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"EAMM"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### C-MET Emotional Accuracy: 86.9. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15ff0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"FLOAT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### C-MET Emotional Accuracy: 80.4. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fea. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"EAT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### C-MET Emotional Accuracy: 51.2. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fed. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"EDTalk"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EDTalk Emotional Accuracy: 36.5. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fee. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EAT Emotional Accuracy: 17.1. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15feb. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Tie Emotional Accuracy: 12.2. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fef. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"EDTalk vs C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FLOAT Emotional Accuracy: 11.8. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15ff1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EAMM Emotional Accuracy: 6.7. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fe8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Tie Emotional Accuracy: 2.4. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fec. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"EAT vs C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Tie Emotional Accuracy: 2.2. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15fe9. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"EAMM vs C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Tie Emotional Accuracy: 1.2. Result ID: 69d8af7647f34ce924c15ff2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Comparison Baseline":"FLOAT vs C-MET"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.