# Tabular Anomaly Detection on Seismic (F1 score) Source: [Tabular Anomaly Detection on Seismic (F1 score)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:43:38.161Z Evaluation of Tabular Anomaly Detection performance on the Seismic dataset, specifically measured using F1 score. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Tabular Anomaly Detection | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Seismic | | Metric | F1 Score | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 16 of 16 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [F1 Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | F1 Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CausalTAD | 46.5 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | CausalTAD | 44.7 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | AnoLLM | 33.6 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | RCA | 32 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | REPEN | 30.6 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | ICL | 29.8 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | GOAD | 29.5 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | KNN | 29.1 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | SLAD | 28.5 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | ECOD | 28.2 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | AnoLLM | 27.9 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | PCA | 26.6 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | DeepSVDD | 25.8 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | IForest | 25.1 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | DTE | 23.9 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | | NeuTral | 19.5 | Not recorded | 698abc00c97a0b3e3b5de2f8 | ### CausalTAD F1 Score: 46.5. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436148. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Variant":"SmolLM-135M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CausalTAD F1 Score: 44.7. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436149. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Variant":"SmolLM-360M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AnoLLM F1 Score: 33.6. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436147. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Variant":"SmolLM-360M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RCA F1 Score: 32. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec443613f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### REPEN F1 Score: 30.6. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436145. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ICL F1 Score: 29.8. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436143. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GOAD F1 Score: 29.5. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436141. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### KNN F1 Score: 29.1. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec443613c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Classical methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SLAD F1 Score: 28.5. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436140. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ECOD F1 Score: 28.2. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec443613d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Classical methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AnoLLM F1 Score: 27.9. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436146. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Variant":"SmolLM-135M"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PCA F1 Score: 26.6. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec443613b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Classical methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DeepSVDD F1 Score: 25.8. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec443613e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### IForest F1 Score: 25.1. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec443613a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Classical methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DTE F1 Score: 23.9. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436144. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NeuTral F1 Score: 19.5. Result ID: 6998df3d5698665ec4436142. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Deep learning based methods"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.