# Synthetic Sequential Combinatorial Optimization on SCO3 OAS (test) Source: [Synthetic Sequential Combinatorial Optimization on SCO3 OAS (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-08T10:09:24.869Z Evaluation of algorithms on the test set of the SCO3 OAS benchmark for synthetic sequential combinatorial optimization problems, focusing on performance gap and average rank. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Synthetic Sequential Combinatorial Optimization | | Dataset (including any stated split) | SCO3 OAS (test) | | Metric | Performance Gap (%) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Performance Gap (%)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Average Rank](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Performance Gap (%) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ReEvo TD & BU | 0 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | | ReEvo TD | 0.2594 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | | MCTS-AHD TD | 0.3033 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | | ReEvo BU | 0.5485 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | | MCTS-AHD BU | 0.6077 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | | Beam Search | 1.7258 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | | Baseline | 55.9252 | Not recorded | 69fd6e175497b3b670c8942c | ### ReEvo TD & BU Performance Gap (%): 0. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e1331f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReEvo TD Performance Gap (%): 0.2594. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e1331c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MCTS-AHD TD Performance Gap (%): 0.3033. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e1331e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReEvo BU Performance Gap (%): 0.5485. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e1331b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MCTS-AHD BU Performance Gap (%): 0.6077. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e1331d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Beam Search Performance Gap (%): 1.7258. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e1331a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Baseline Performance Gap (%): 55.9252. Result ID: 69fdb64f47f34ce924e13319. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.