# Surgical Phase Recognition on Cholec51 (test)

Source: [Surgical Phase Recognition on Cholec51 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/surgical-phase-recognition-on-cholec51-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:28:10.828Z

Evaluation of surgical phase recognition performance using the test split of the Cholec51 dataset, assessed using metrics like Accuracy, Precision, and Recall.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Surgical Phase Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Cholec51 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/surgical-phase-recognition-on-cholec51-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Precision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/surgical-phase-recognition-on-cholec51-test.md?metric=Precision>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/surgical-phase-recognition-on-cholec51-test.md?metric=Recall>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TeCNO | 87.34 | Not recorded | 68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d |
| ResNetLSTM | 86.15 | Not recorded | 68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d |
| PhaseLSTM | 81.94 | Not recorded | 68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d |

### TeCNO

Accuracy: 87.34. Result ID: 698ebb7effc3901de0a031a1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"feature extractor":"ResNet50"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ResNetLSTM

Accuracy: 86.15. Result ID: 698ebb7effc3901de0a031a0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PhaseLSTM

Accuracy: 81.94. Result ID: 698ebb7effc3901de0a0319f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0c1e209131cea31a7d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa627b1e209131ce9f97aa.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.