# Subjective evaluation of agent feedback on User Study 30 participants 1.0 (test)

Source: [Subjective evaluation of agent feedback on User Study 30 participants 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-14T07:05:07.406Z

Subjective evaluation derived from a user study involving 30 participants, measuring confidence levels regarding agent understanding, feedback quality, teaching effectiveness, and the utility and relevance of the feedback provided.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Subjective evaluation of agent feedback |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | User Study 30 participants 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | Confidence in Understanding |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Confidence in Understanding](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test.md?metric=Confidence%20in%20Understanding>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Feedback Confidence](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test.md?metric=Feedback%20Confidence>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Termination Confidence](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test.md?metric=Termination%20Confidence>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Teaching Confidence](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test.md?metric=Teaching%20Confidence>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Feedback Utility](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test.md?metric=Feedback%20Utility>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Feedback Relevance](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/subjective-evaluation-of-agent-feedback-on-user-study-30-participants-1-0-test.md?metric=Feedback%20Relevance>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Confidence in Understanding | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ToM-2 | 2.9 | Not recorded | 6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb |
| ToM-0 Random | 2.66 | Not recorded | 6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb |
| ToM-0 | 2.45 | Not recorded | 6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb |

### ToM-2

Confidence in Understanding: 2.9. Result ID: 6a0573fc47f34ce924ebef92.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ToM-0 Random

Confidence in Understanding: 2.66. Result ID: 6a0573fc47f34ce924ebef91.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ToM-0

Confidence in Understanding: 2.45. Result ID: 6a0573fc47f34ce924ebef90.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a05571adbc836b87d828ceb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.