# Subgraph Alignment on LEAMR 1.0 (test) Source: [Subgraph Alignment on LEAMR 1.0 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:42:25.844Z Evaluation of model performance on Subgraph Alignment using the test split of the LEAMR 1.0 dataset, measured using Exact Alignment F1, Partial Alignment F1, Spans F1, and Coverage. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Subgraph Alignment | | Dataset (including any stated split) | LEAMR 1.0 (test) | | Metric | Exact Alignment Precision | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Exact Alignment Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Exact Alignment Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Exact Alignment F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Partial Alignment Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Partial Alignment Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Partial Alignment F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Spans F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Coverage](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Exact Alignment Precision | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Guided Cross-Attention | 94.39 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | Unguided Cross-Attention | 94.11 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | LEAMR | 93.91 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | LEAMR | 93.74 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | Guided Cross-Attention | 89.87 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | JAMR | 87.21 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | TAMR | 85.68 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | Unguided Cross-Attention | 77.78 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | ISI | 71.56 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | Guided Cross-Attention | 70 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | LEAMR | 68.75 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | LEAMR | 66.67 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | | Guided Cross-Attention | 63.16 | Not recorded | 68fa6fca1e209131cea476d4 | ### Guided Cross-Attention Exact Alignment Precision: 94.39. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450bc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Guidance":"Guided","Silver Source":"LEAMR"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Unguided Cross-Attention Exact Alignment Precision: 94.11. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450ba. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Guidance":"Unguided"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LEAMR Exact Alignment Precision: 93.91. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450b8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LEAMR Exact Alignment Precision: 93.74. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450b9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Re-implemented":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Guided Cross-Attention Exact Alignment Precision: 89.87. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450bb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Guidance":"Guided","Silver Source":"ISI"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### JAMR Exact Alignment Precision: 87.21. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450b6. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TAMR Exact Alignment Precision: 85.68. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450b7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Unguided Cross-Attention Exact Alignment Precision: 77.78. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450ca. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Guidance":"Unguided"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ISI Exact Alignment Precision: 71.56. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450b5. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Guided Cross-Attention Exact Alignment Precision: 70. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450cc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Guidance":"Guided","Silver Source":"LEAMR"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LEAMR Exact Alignment Precision: 68.75. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450c9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Re-implemented":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LEAMR Exact Alignment Precision: 66.67. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450c8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Guided Cross-Attention Exact Alignment Precision: 63.16. Result ID: 6990ec4f3a6c3148490450cb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Guidance":"Guided","Silver Source":"ISI"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.