# Style Representation Evaluation on STEL-or-Content Multilingual (averaged across languages)

Source: [Style Representation Evaluation on STEL-or-Content Multilingual (averaged across languages)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/style-representation-evaluation-on-stel-or-content-multilingual-averaged-across-languages>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:04:23.386Z

Evaluation of linguistic style representation attributes (Simplicity, Formality, Toxicity, Positivity) averaged across multiple languages using the STEL-or-Content dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Style Representation Evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | STEL-or-Content Multilingual (averaged across languages) |
| Metric | Simplicity Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Simplicity Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/style-representation-evaluation-on-stel-or-content-multilingual-averaged-across-languages.md?metric=Simplicity%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Formality Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/style-representation-evaluation-on-stel-or-content-multilingual-averaged-across-languages.md?metric=Formality%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Toxicity Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/style-representation-evaluation-on-stel-or-content-multilingual-averaged-across-languages.md?metric=Toxicity%20Score>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Positivity Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/style-representation-evaluation-on-stel-or-content-multilingual-averaged-across-languages.md?metric=Positivity%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Simplicity Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MSTYLEDISTANCE | 36 | Not recorded | 68fa770c1e209131cea70be3 |
| Wegmann et al. (2022) | 23 | Not recorded | 68fa770c1e209131cea70be3 |
| STYLEDISTANCE | 21 | Not recorded | 68fa770c1e209131cea70be3 |
| LISA | 15 | Not recorded | 68fa770c1e209131cea70be3 |
| xlm-roberta-base | 12 | Not recorded | 68fa770c1e209131cea70be3 |

### MSTYLEDISTANCE

Simplicity Score: 36. Result ID: 699455a73a6c3148491c9440.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa770c1e209131cea70be3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa770c1e209131cea70be3.md>)

[Implementation](<https://huggingface.co/StyleDistance/mstyledistance>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Wegmann et al. (2022)

Simplicity Score: 23. Result ID: 699455a73a6c3148491c943c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa770c1e209131cea70be3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c441e209131cea331f0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### STYLEDISTANCE

Simplicity Score: 21. Result ID: 699455a73a6c3148491c943d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa770c1e209131cea70be3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa76e01e209131cea6f8b2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LISA

Simplicity Score: 15. Result ID: 699455a73a6c3148491c943f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa770c1e209131cea70be3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70cc1e209131cea4d39d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### xlm-roberta-base

Simplicity Score: 12. Result ID: 699455a73a6c3148491c943e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa770c1e209131cea70be3.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67521e209131cea15706.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
