# Strategic Game Playing on TextArena SPIN-Bench Source: [Strategic Game Playing on TextArena SPIN-Bench]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-11T07:03:51.820Z Evaluation of strategic game playing performance across various scenarios (e.g., Negotiation, Poker, Tak) within the TextArena SPIN-Bench framework, measured by metrics like Win Rate and RSE. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Strategic Game Playing | | Dataset (including any stated split) | TextArena SPIN-Bench | | Metric | Win Rate (Simple Negotiation) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 6 of 6 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Win Rate (Simple Negotiation)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Win Rate (Two Dollar Game)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Win Rate (Kuhn Poker)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Win Rate (Briscola)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Win Rate (Simple Tak)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Mean Win Rate](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Mean RSE](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Win Rate (Simple Negotiation) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MEMO | 54.9 | Not recorded | 69b0f6f52d603e6de3e45c5a | | MEMO | 48 | Not recorded | 69b0f6f52d603e6de3e45c5a | | baseline | 31.3 | Not recorded | 69b0f6f52d603e6de3e45c5a | | MEMO | 30 | Not recorded | 69b0f6f52d603e6de3e45c5a | | baseline | 24 | Not recorded | 69b0f6f52d603e6de3e45c5a | | baseline | 14 | Not recorded | 69b0f6f52d603e6de3e45c5a | ### MEMO Win Rate (Simple Negotiation): 54.9. Result ID: 69b113bc6dbb7075b95af612. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Model":"GPT-4o-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MEMO Win Rate (Simple Negotiation): 48. Result ID: 69b113bc6dbb7075b95af614. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Model":"Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### baseline Win Rate (Simple Negotiation): 31.3. Result ID: 69b113bc6dbb7075b95af611. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Model":"GPT-4o-mini"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MEMO Win Rate (Simple Negotiation): 30. Result ID: 69b113bc6dbb7075b95af616. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Model":"Gemini-2.5-Flash"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### baseline Win Rate (Simple Negotiation): 24. Result ID: 69b113bc6dbb7075b95af613. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Model":"Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### baseline Win Rate (Simple Negotiation): 14. Result ID: 69b113bc6dbb7075b95af615. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Model":"Gemini-2.5-Flash"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.