# Spurious Correlation Mitigation on ImageNet

Source: [Spurious Correlation Mitigation on ImageNet](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/spurious-correlation-mitigation-on-imagenet>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-18T06:41:19.509Z

Evaluation of model performance on the ImageNet dataset specifically targeting the mitigation of spurious correlations, measured by Overall, Clean, and Spurious Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Spurious Correlation Mitigation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet |
| Metric | Overall Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Overall Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/spurious-correlation-mitigation-on-imagenet.md?metric=Overall%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Clean Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/spurious-correlation-mitigation-on-imagenet.md?metric=Clean%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Spurious Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/spurious-correlation-mitigation-on-imagenet.md?metric=Spurious%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Overall Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Benign model | 69.14 | Not recorded | 69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7 |
| Fine-tuned model | 67.83 | Not recorded | 69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7 |
| Dynamic edited model | 67.6 | Not recorded | 69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7 |
| Fine-tuned model | 67.41 | Not recorded | 69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7 |
| Dynamic edited model | 66.19 | Not recorded | 69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7 |

### Benign model

Overall Accuracy: 69.14. Result ID: 69ba488047f34ce924a37609.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Fine-tuned model

Overall Accuracy: 67.83. Result ID: 69ba488047f34ce924a3760b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"n":"20"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dynamic edited model

Overall Accuracy: 67.6. Result ID: 69ba488047f34ce924a3760d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"n":"20"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Fine-tuned model

Overall Accuracy: 67.41. Result ID: 69ba488047f34ce924a3760a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"n":"10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dynamic edited model

Overall Accuracy: 66.19. Result ID: 69ba488047f34ce924a3760c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69ba316b0636e5bf4afc05f7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"n":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
